Standards and compliance
A guideline is not a law and a law is not a certificate. These pages explain what each document is, who issues it, what it asks of a laboratory or an organisation and where the official text lives.

Forensic work sits inside a frame of law and standards. The law says what may be seized, how electronic records are proved and how personal data must be treated. The standards say how a laboratory should identify, collect, acquire, examine and report on evidence so that the result can be repeated and trusted. Each guide below separates the two and says plainly what the document does not do.
Dates matter. Acts commence in stages, rules are notified months after the Act and standards are revised or withdrawn. Every guide carries the status we found on the official page and the date we checked it.
India
The Acts, Rules and directions that decide how electronic evidence and personal data are handled in India
- Act · Parliament of IndiaDPDP Act 2023India's first general data protection law. It binds anyone who decides how digital personal data is processed, and it reaches forensic laboratories because evidence copies and case files are full of other people's data.
- Rules · Ministry of Electronics and Information TechnologyDPDP Rules 2025The Rules fill in the detail the Act left to the Government: what a notice must say, what counts as reasonable security, how a breach is reported, how long data is kept and how the Board works. They come into force in three stages over eighteen months.
- Act · Parliament of IndiaIT Act 2000The IT Act gave electronic records legal standing, created India's computer offences and set up CERT-In and the Examiner of Electronic Evidence. Most cybercrime cases an examiner touches are charged under it alongside the general criminal law.
- Act · Parliament of IndiaBNSS 2023The criminal procedure code in force since 1 July 2024. It is the first Indian procedure law written with phones, devices and video in mind, and it decides how digital evidence is lawfully obtained before any examiner sees it.
- Act · Parliament of IndiaBSA 2023The evidence law in force since 1 July 2024. It treats electronic records as documents, lets copies stand as primary evidence and requires a certificate with hash values whenever an electronic record is tendered under section 63.
- Directions · Indian Computer Emergency Response TeamCERT-In Directions 2022Six binding directions issued by CERT-In on 28 April 2022 to service providers, intermediaries, data centres, body corporates and Government organisations. They decide what logs exist and how soon an incident is reported, which is the raw material of every network investigation in India.
International privacy
What applies when the data, the person or the client is in another jurisdiction
- Regulation · European UnionGDPRThe General Data Protection Regulation is the European Union's data protection law. It follows the data, so a laboratory, training institute or incident response team in India is caught the moment it handles information about people in the EU for an EU client.
- Act · United KingdomUK GDPR and DPA 2018The United Kingdom kept the GDPR after leaving the EU as the UK GDPR, supplemented by the Data Protection Act 2018. The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 is now changing both in stages, so dates matter more than usual on this page.
- Act · State of CaliforniaCCPA / CPRACalifornia's privacy law applies to for-profit businesses that meet revenue or volume thresholds, and it reaches their vendors by contract. It is a state law, enforced by the Attorney General and a dedicated agency, and it is not the law of the rest of the United States.
Forensic standards
The ISO/IEC, NIST and SWGDE documents a laboratory works to
- Standard · ISO/IECISO/IEC 27037:2012ISO/IEC 27037:2012 is the international standard for the first hours of digital evidence handling, from spotting a device to keeping it unchanged. This page explains what it asks for and how a laboratory in India puts it to work.
- Standard · ISO/IECISO/IEC 27041:2015ISO/IEC 27041:2015 answers the question every court eventually asks: how do you know your method works? It is the assurance standard of the ISO/IEC digital investigation family.
- Standard · ISO/IECISO/IEC 27042:2015ISO/IEC 27042:2015 picks up where ISO/IEC 27037:2012 stops. It covers what an examiner does with a preserved copy, how to keep analysis separate from opinion and what a report must let a reviewer check.
- Standard · ISO/IECISO/IEC 27043:2015ISO/IEC 27043:2015 is the map of the whole investigation, from preparing before anything goes wrong to closing the case. The other ISO/IEC forensic standards are its chapters in detail.
- Standard · NISTNIST SP 800-86NIST SP 800-86 is the guide that gave incident responders a forensic process they could write into policy. Twenty years on, its four phases still shape how laboratories describe their work.
- Standard · NISTNIST SP 800-101 Rev. 1NIST SP 800-101 Rev. 1 is the reference most mobile forensic procedures trace back to. It gives the tool classification pyramid, the preservation routine and the acquisition rules that laboratories still follow.
- Standard · NISTNIST SP 800-72NIST SP 800-72 is a 2004 guide to a class of device that no longer exists. It is on this site because its state model, roles and principles survived into the mobile forensics guidance that replaced it.
- Standard · NISTNIST SP 800-88 Rev. 2NIST SP 800-88 Rev. 2 is the reference most organisations name when they say a drive was securely erased. This page sets out what the final September 2025 text contains and how a forensic laboratory, which both erases media and examines erased media, should use it.
- Best practice · Scientific Working Group on Digital EvidenceSWGDE Best PracticesSWGDE publishes the free, practical documents that most digital forensic procedures are quietly built on. This page explains how the library is organised, which documents matter for each kind of work and how they relate to the OSAC Registry.
Evidence lifecycle
The twelve stages every case passes through and what protects each one
The Twelve Stages
- 01Identification
Recognising which devices, accounts and data sources might hold relevant evidence, including the ones that are easy to miss such as routers, wearables, cloud accounts and the DVR in the next room. The usual failure is tunnel vision on the obvious phone and laptop. A written list of potential sources, with what each might contain, is what the authority stage needs.
- 02Authority and Scope
Establishing the legal basis for every action: a warrant, a court order, a summons under section 94 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, a contract or the owner's documented consent, together with the limits that go with it. Examinations that exceed their authority produce evidence that may be excluded and examiners who may be liable. The record of authority, and of what it does not permit, must travel with the evidence.
- 03Preservation
Stopping change from the moment a source is identified: isolating phones from networks, deciding whether a running system is kept alive, preventing writes and placing legal holds on cloud and corporate data. Powering on a seized SSD to have a look, or letting a phone receive a remote wipe, destroys evidence before anyone has copied it. Preservation delivers an unchanged source to collection.
- 04Collection
Taking physical or logical possession of the source: seizing the device, photographing it in place, labelling it and starting the custody record with the authority that allowed it. Under the Sanhita the search and seizure may have to be video recorded. Missing labels and unsigned seizure lists are the common failure. Collection hands acquisition an identified exhibit with a custody record already open.
- 05Acquisition
Making the forensic copy: a bit-stream image through a write blocker or duplicator, a logical or file-system extraction from a phone, a memory capture or an export from a cloud provider, with hashes computed as the data is read and verified afterwards. Imaging without verification, or without recording the tool, version and times, leaves nothing to prove later. Acquisition delivers a verified copy and the original untouched.
- 06Examination
Processing the copy to find and extract the data that may matter: parsing file systems, recovering deleted material, decoding application databases, carving unallocated space and filtering with known-file hash sets. Working on the master copy instead of a verified working copy is the classic error. Examination delivers extracted artefacts with their locations and the method used.
- 07Analysis
Working out what the artefacts mean in the context of the questions asked: building timelines, correlating sources, testing alternative explanations and separating what the data shows from what the examiner infers. Overreach, stating as fact what is only consistent with the data, is what gets reports attacked. Analysis delivers findings with their basis and their limits.
- 08Documentation
The contemporaneous notes, logs, screenshots and tool outputs that record what was done, when, by whom and with what result, from the first phone call to the last export. Notes written up a week later from memory are not contemporaneous. Documentation is what makes the work repeatable and is the source for the report.
- 09Reporting
Writing the findings so that a reader with no technical background can follow what was examined, how, what was found and what it means, with the hashes, exhibit references and limitations in place. Reports that bury the answer in tool output, or omit what could not be determined, fail the reader. The report delivers a document that can be read without the examiner present.
- 10Presentation
Giving evidence: in court, before a tribunal, to a board or to a client, increasingly over video under section 530 of the Sanhita. The examiner must explain, not advocate, and must be able to reproduce any figure in the report from the documentation. Being unable to say how a hash was computed is the failure that undoes everything before it. Presentation delivers testimony that matches the record.
- 11Retention
Keeping the original evidence, images, working copies, notes and reports for as long as the matter and any appeal, the client's instructions, the laboratory's policy and the law require, under the same access control and custody as during the case. Data protection law now adds retention periods and erasure duties of its own. Retention delivers an intact record for as long as it is needed and a date on which it stops being needed.
- 12Secure Disposal
Destroying or sanitising every copy when retention ends, with a documented method appropriate to the media, a verification step and a certificate of sanitisation kept with the case file. Returning a client's drive with another client's image still on it, or discarding a working copy unwiped, is a breach waiting to be found. Disposal closes the loop and leaves a record that the data is gone.
This page is educational material, not legal advice. Laws and standards change, commence on different dates and are interpreted differently across jurisdictions. Always read the official text linked on this page and take advice from a qualified professional for a real matter.
Go deeper with DFRTI
Free pages explain the ground. Structured courses, lab work and a mentor take you from knowing about it to doing it on a case.