LegalFoundation & Legal CoursesBasics of Cyber ForensicsStart here. Evidence handling, imaging, hashing, chain of custody and your first analysis.SWGDE Best Practices for Digital Evidence
SWGDE publishes the free, practical documents that most digital forensic procedures are quietly built on. This page explains how the library is organised, which documents matter for each kind of work and how they relate to the OSAC Registry.

The Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence, SWGDE, describes itself as an organisation that brings together bodies involved in digital and multimedia evidence to foster communication, cooperation, consistency and quality within the forensic community through consensus-based documents. Its website dates its work from 1998. Members are voted in from government, the legal community, private industry and academia, and a prospective member attends two meetings as a guest first. The group is led by a chair and a vice chair and meets in person in the United States, with meetings listed for January and May 2027.
The technical work is done in seven committees: Audio, Cellular and Geolocation, Forensics, Imaging, Photography, Quality and Standards and Video. Three administrative committees, Bylaws, Membership and Outreach, support them, and ad hoc committees are formed for new topics. Every document is free to download, which is the main reason SWGDE's influence reaches far beyond the United States, including into Indian laboratories.
This page is an overview of the library rather than a summary of any one document. Where a single SWGDE document is central to a topic, for example DVR acquisition or hash algorithms, our Insights articles cover it in depth.
How the Library Is Organised
The documents section of swgde.org has five views. The published complete listing holds every document that has completed its comment period; SWGDE calls these final releases and living documents, updates them periodically, puts substantive changes through a fresh comment period and shows only the most recent applicable version. Drafts released for comment are open to anyone for a stated minimum period of 60 days. Positions and considerations are written directly by members to give a position or guidance on a topic and are not put out for public comment. Superseded and archived documents are kept in a separate archive, as are the documents of the former Scientific Working Group on Imaging Technology, SWGIT, whose work SWGDE absorbed.
Each document carries a number such as 17-V-002-1.4. SWGDE does not explain the pattern on its site; our reading is that the first pair is the year the document was started, the letter is the committee, F for Forensics, V for Video, A for Audio, I for Imaging, P for Photography, Q for Quality and Standards, M for documents shared across committees and B for the bylaws, the three digits are a sequence and the final figures are the version. The version is part of the identity: a report should cite 17-V-002-1.4, not just the title.
SWGDE states on its listing pages that it does not certify, approve, recommend or endorse any product, service, technology or practitioner based on claims of compliance with its documents. There is no SWGDE certification of laboratories or people.
The Documents That Matter Most, by Area
Versions and dates are as shown on swgde.org on 2 November 2026. Check the listing before citing, because versions change several times a year.
- ComputerBest Practices for Computer Forensic Acquisitions (17-F-002-2.1)
Dated 5 August 2025. The acquisition document for disks and computers, covering write blocking, imaging, verification and documentation. On the OSAC Registry.
- ComputerBest Practices for Computer Forensic Examinations (18-F-001-2.0)
Dated 28 July 2025. The examination counterpart, from planning the examination to recording results.
- ComputerBest Practices for Digital Evidence Collection (18-F-002-2.0)
Dated 20 November 2025. Scene-side collection of digital evidence of all kinds, read with Considerations for Focused Collection of Digital Evidence (14-F-003-2.0) of the same date.
- ComputerBest Practices for Handling Damaged Digital Storage Devices (14-F-002-2.0)
Dated 4 March 2025. What to do, and not do, with drives that have been dropped, flooded or burnt before they reach a recovery bench.
- ComputerBest Practices for Data Destruction, Media Sterilization and Sanitization (24-F-001-1.0)
Dated 9 July 2026. The examiner's view of sanitization, a companion to NIST SP 800-88 Rev. 2.
- MobileBest Practices for Mobile Device Evidence Collection and Preservation, Handling and Acquisition (18-F-003-2.0)
Dated 21 August 2025. The central mobile document, covering isolation, handling and acquisition. On the OSAC Registry and cited by NIST SP 800-101 Rev. 1 in its earlier form.
- MobileCore Competencies for Mobile Device Forensics (12-F-003-2.0)
Dated 12 July 2025. What an examiner must know and be able to do before working on phones, useful for training plans and competency records.
- MobileBest Practices for Historical Cell Site Analysis (17-F-001-5.0)
Dated 9 July 2026, from the Cellular and Geolocation Committee, with the newer Best Practices for Radio Frequency Propagation Surveys (25-F-003-1.0) of 16 July 2026.
- VideoBest Practices for Data Acquisition from Digital Video Recorders (17-V-002-1.4)
Dated 21 August 2025. How to get footage out of a DVR with its player, timing and integrity intact. Our DVR evidence explainer is built on it.
- VideoTechnical Overview of Digital Video Files (17-V-001-1.5)
Dated 21 July 2026. Containers, codecs and how DVRs store streams, the background every video examiner needs.
- VideoBest Practices for Digital Forensic Video Analysis (18-V-001-2.0)
Dated 10 December 2025, with Best Practices for Digital Video Authentication (23-V-001-1.2) of 7 March 2024 for questions of whether a video is what it claims to be.
- AudioBest Practices for Enhancement of Digital Audio (20-A-001-2.0)
Dated 21 August 2025, with Core Competencies for Forensic Audio (10-A-001-3.3) and Technical Notes on FFmpeg for Forensic Audio Examination (23-A-001-1.1), both of 3 March 2025, and the older Best Practices for Digital Audio Authentication (version 1.3, 2018).
- ImageGuidelines for Forensic Image Analysis (16-I-002-2.0)
Dated 18 March 2025. Read with Best Practices for Image Authentication (18-I-001-2.0) and Best Practices for Maintaining the Integrity of Imagery (17-I-001-1.1), both of 3 March 2025, and Legal and Scientific Support Relating to the Admissibility of Image Examinations (23-I-001-1.0) of 20 November 2025.
- MultimediaVideo and Audio Redaction Guidelines (18-M-001-2.3)
Dated 19 December 2025. A multi-committee document on redacting recordings for release, on the OSAC Registry.
- QualityMinimum Requirements for Testing Tools Used in Digital and Multimedia Forensics (18-Q-001-2.1)
Dated 7 March 2024. The practical companion to ISO/IEC 27041:2015 on validating tools.
- QualityRequirements for Report Writing in Digital and Multimedia Forensics (18-Q-002)
Dated 20 November 2018, with Best Practices for Personnel Presenting Digital Evidence in Legal Proceedings (23-Q-001-1.1) of 2 February 2024 and the guidance on establishing a quality management system under ISO/IEC 17025 or ISO/IEC 17020 (version 2.0, 2021).
- PositionsPosition on the Use of MD5 and SHA1 Hash Algorithms in Digital and Multimedia Forensics
Dated 29 September 2019. A members' position rather than a commented document, and the one most often asked about. Our hash verification tutorial explains what it says.
How a Laboratory Applies Them
- 01Pick the Documents for Your Scope
A laboratory that does computer and mobile work needs the Forensics Committee documents and the Quality and Standards documents; one that adds CCTV work adds the Video Committee set. List them in the quality system with their numbers and versions.
- 02Map Them to Your Procedures
Each standard operating procedure cites the SWGDE documents it draws on, so that an assessor or a court can see the lineage of a step.
- 03Record the Version Used
Reports and procedures cite the document number and version, for example 18-F-003-2.0, because the next version may say something different.
- 04Check the Listing Twice a Year
SWGDE publishes after each meeting. A short review of the published listing and the drafts for comment, with a note of what changed, keeps procedures current.
- 05Comment on Drafts
Drafts are open to everyone for at least 60 days. Laboratories outside the United States that comment get documents that fit their conditions better.
- 06Train Against the Competency Documents
The core competencies and training guidelines give a ready structure for training records, which is also what an ISO/IEC 17025 assessor looks for.
SWGDE and the OSAC Registry
The Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science, OSAC, is administered by NIST. It keeps the OSAC Registry, which on 2 November 2026 listed 264 entries: 189 standards published by standards developing organisations and 75 OSAC proposed standards. A document reaches the Registry after a technical and quality review open to practitioners, researchers, statisticians, legal experts and the public, and placement needs a two-thirds vote of both the proposing OSAC subcommittee and the Forensic Science Standards Board. OSAC says it encourages the forensic science community to implement the listed standards; it does not and cannot require it.
SWGDE appears on the Registry as the owner of several listed standards. The Digital Evidence Subcommittee's page lists, among others, SWGDE 18-F-003-2.0 on mobile device collection, 17-F-002-2.1 on computer forensic acquisitions, 12-F-004-3.2 on vehicle infotainment and telematics, 18-M-001-2.3 on redaction, 18-Q-001-1.0 on testing tools, 21-F-001-1.1 on acquiring online content, 23-F-003-1.0 on Internet of Things seizure, 23-F-004-1.1 on cloud service providers and 23-F-005-1.0 on Apple macOS acquisition, alongside ASTM standards such as ANSI/ASTM E2916-19e2 on terminology, E3017-19 on magnetic card readers and E3150-18 (2023) on forensic audio laboratory setup. A further set of SWGDE documents is listed as published by a standards developing organisation and awaiting OSAC evaluation.
Two cautions follow. The Registry can lag SWGDE: it lists 17-F-001 at version 2.0 while SWGDE's current version is 5.0, and 18-Q-001 at 1.0 against SWGDE's 2.1. And SWGDE's own listing page carries the heading that its documents can be found on the NIST OSAC Registry, which is true of some, not all. When a report says a method follows an OSAC Registry standard, the examiner should have checked the Registry entry and its version, not only the SWGDE page.
What They Do Not Do and Common Misunderstandings
- They are consensus documents from a United States group. They have no legal force in the United States or in India, and an Indian court is under no obligation to prefer them.
- Best practice does not mean the only acceptable practice. A laboratory may depart from a SWGDE document for a documented reason, and the documents themselves say they are living and open to comment.
- SWGDE certifies nothing and endorses no product, tool or practitioner. A tool vendor's claim to be SWGDE compliant is the vendor's own claim.
- Positions and considerations were not put through public comment and carry a different weight from commented best practices. Say which kind you are citing.
- Following SWGDE documents is not accreditation. Accreditation is assessed against ISO/IEC 17025 by a body such as NABL in India, and SWGDE's own quality documents on accreditation make that distinction.
- Versions move. A citation without a version number, or to a superseded version, is the most common SWGDE error in reports.
Common Questions
How do SWGDE documents compare with the ISO/IEC standards?
The ISO/IEC 27037, 27041, 27042 and 27043 standards are short, abstract and paid, and give a laboratory an international vocabulary. SWGDE documents are long, practical, free and current with technology. Most laboratories write their quality system to the ISO/IEC vocabulary and their bench procedures from SWGDE.
Can an Indian laboratory join SWGDE?
Membership is by vote after attending two meetings as a guest, and the meetings are in the United States. Reading, using and commenting on the documents needs no membership.
Where do the old SWGIT imaging documents stand?
They are kept in the SWGIT archive on swgde.org for reference. The current imaging guidance is in the Imaging Committee's published documents, which replaced them.
Which single document should a new examiner read first?
For computer work, Best Practices for Computer Forensic Acquisitions. For mobile work, Best Practices for Mobile Device Evidence Collection and Preservation, Handling and Acquisition. For video, the Technical Overview of Digital Video Files. Then the report writing requirements, because every examination ends in a report.
Official sources
- SWGDE Published, Complete Listing of current documentsScientific Working Group on Digital Evidence
- SWGDE Documents section (published by committee, drafts, positions, archives)Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence
- OSAC Registry (approved standards and OSAC proposed standards)NIST, Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science
- OSAC Digital Evidence Subcommittee (standards on the Registry and under evaluation)NIST, Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science
This page is educational material, not legal advice. Laws and standards change, commence on different dates and are interpreted differently across jurisdictions. Always read the official text linked on this page and take advice from a qualified professional for a real matter.
Courses that teach it
LegalFoundation & Legal CoursesBasics of Cyber ForensicsStart here. Evidence handling, imaging, hashing, chain of custody and your first analysis.
VideoSurveillance & Image / Video ForensicsCCTV / DVR AnalysisExport footage from Hikvision, Dahua and other DVRs with correct times, frames and hashes
LegalFoundation & Legal CoursesForensic Report WritingWrite clear forensic reports that answer the questions asked and survive cross-examination.Go deeper with DFRTI
Free pages explain the ground. Structured courses, lab work and a mentor take you from knowing about it to doing it on a case.